Accountability that travels with the work.
Permissions, approvals and reviewable results make AI manageable in the enterprise.
Define the scope of action
Distinguish between reading data, creating drafts and changing existing information. Align roles and available tools with those tasks.
Describe accountability through concrete work. Who may read customer data, prepare a draft or change an existing record? These questions are easier to answer than a broad decision about “AI access.” Use the answers to determine the required roles, object permissions and tools. Review new tasks again when they involve different data or a different effect.
Keep decisions visible
AIOS connects agent approvals to the corresponding run, keeping a decision in context. For important operations, also check that the result matches the approved goal.
An approval is only as useful as the information behind it. For important changes, request a clear description of the goal, affected objects and proposed result. After the run, check whether the actual change matches that description. The decision linked to the run provides context; responsibility for assessing it remains with the relevant team.
AIOSInvestigate unusual activity
Security events, session information and traffic analysis support investigation of unusual activity. Align additional requirements such as MFA, network boundaries and data retention with your deployment.
Define a straightforward investigation path for unusual activity. Start with the time, affected task and account involved. Consult the available session information, security events and traffic views where your role provides access. Separate confirmed observations from assumptions and identify who should take the next step. This keeps the investigation understandable without jumping from one signal to a presumed cause.
Try it yourself
Adapt the placeholders to your task. This example is a template for your work with AIOS.
Purpose of the change: [What outcome is needed?]
Affected objects: [Specific records or content]
Proposed effect: [What will change?]
Basis: [Sources and relevant instructions]
Decision owner: [Person/team]
Open points before deciding: [Missing information or conflicts]
Result review: [How will the actual effect be assessed?]
Work reference: [Run/task and time]
After execution, record: Result, deviations and the owner of the next step.Assign responsibility throughout the workflow
| Stage | Concrete question | Expected clarity |
|---|---|---|
| Before starting | Which data and actions does this task need? | A scoped, understandable brief. |
| Before an important action | What is being decided, and what is the effect? | A concrete proposal with affected objects. |
| After execution | Does the result match the agreed goal? | A reviewed result and identified deviations. |
| When activity is unusual | What is confirmed, and who investigates next? | Observations, context and the next owner. |